Contact
Submit Post
CLATDrishti > All Exams > CLAT Blogs > CLAT 2025 Exam Analysis

CLAT 2025 Exam Analysis

CLAT 2025 Exam Analysis: Detailed Breakdown of Paper and Performance

The CLAT 2025 examination has officially concluded, and with over 1 Lakh+ admit cards issued, the exam has generated immense interest. This blog offers a comprehensive CLAT 2025 exam analysis to help candidates assess their performance and strategize for future attempts.

In this analysis, we will break down the exam’s key aspects, including difficulty level, section-wise performance, and how this year’s exam compares to the previous one.

Overall Paper Overview

The CLAT 2025 exam was notably easier than expected, with a paper similar in difficulty to CLAT 2024. Due to the simplicity of the questions, a higher cutoff is anticipated this year. The passages were brief, and the questions were clear and straightforward, making it possible for candidates to manage their time effectively.

Section-wise Analysis of CLAT 2025

Let’s dive deeper into the different sections of the CLAT 2025 exam and explore the specifics of what candidates faced:

1. English Section

The English section was designed to test comprehension and language skills. It featured:

  • Short and Direct Passages: The passages were concise and easy to follow.
  • George Orwell Passage: A passage from George Orwell’s “How to Improve Your Life” was included.
  • Simple Comprehension-based Questions: The questions were straightforward and focused on understanding the core message of the text.

Overall, this section was very easy and catered to those who are proficient in reading and understanding basic texts.

2. Logical Reasoning

The Logical Reasoning section offered a mix of questions:

  • Contextual Reasoning & Seating Arrangements: A combination of these types of questions appeared, challenging candidates to think critically.
  • Analytical Reasoning Question: One question from analytical reasoning (AR) required deeper thinking.
  • Moderate Difficulty: About 1/6 of the questions were based on inadequate data, adding complexity.
  • Time Management: Though manageable, this section was time-consuming.

This section was a blend of easy and moderate questions, with candidates needing to apply logical thinking quickly.

The Legal Aptitude section focused on:

  • Basic Legal Concepts: Key topics like contracts, the right to privacy, and the 42nd Amendment.
  • Recent Legal Updates: Several questions referred to recent legal developments.
  • Straightforward Questions: Most questions were easy to answer, though some required extra knowledge beyond the core syllabus.

For many, this section was easy but demanded awareness of contemporary legal issues.

4. General Knowledge (GK)

The GK section was simpler compared to previous years:

  • Current Affairs Focus: Topics included Article 370, Civil Disobedience, the Shakti Scheme, and the Olympics.
  • Similar to CLAT 2024: Those who kept up with current events found this section easier.
  • Easy and Direct Questions: The questions were straightforward and required no complex analysis.

This section was easy for well-prepared candidates who regularly followed current affairs.

5. Quantitative Techniques (QT)

The Quantitative Techniques section proved to be more challenging:

  • Time-consuming Questions: Some questions were tricky and required good problem-solving skills.
  • Difficult Question on Dearness Allowance: One question, in particular, on Dearness Allowance, was notably difficult.
  • Easy to Moderate Questions: The remaining questions ranged from easy to moderate.
  • Time Management Critical: Strong time management skills were essential to complete this section successfully.

This section was not particularly difficult but demanded careful time management and focus.

Conclusion

In conclusion, CLAT 2025 proved to be an easier exam compared to previous years. While the questions were direct and manageable, the higher expected cutoff means candidates will need to improve in areas that require additional preparation, especially in time management and current affairs knowledge.

By understanding the structure of the exam and focusing on weak areas, candidates can better prepare for the upcoming challenges. Stay tuned for more updates, strategies, and tips to improve your performance in future CLAT exams!

AILET Question Papers & Answer Keys (2008-2024) – Click Here

  • 20 Shares

Join our WhatsApp
Channel

Join Now

Join our Telegram
Group

Join Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Unleashing Legal Wisdom: Maxims and Phrases to Master CLAT 2025

What is a Legal Maxim?

  • A legal maxim is a firmly established legal concept, proposal, or doctrine, typically articulated in Latin. Many of these Latin maxims have their roots in the Medieval era of European states that utilized Latin as their official language.
  • These principles play a crucial role in assisting courts worldwide in the equitable and just application of existing laws, facilitating the resolution of disputes before them. While these principles lack inherent legal authority, their utilization by courts in legal decisions or adoption by legislatures in enacting laws transforms them into legal norms, forming the basis for sound judgments.

Why is it Important to Learn Legal Maxims for CLAT?

Legal Maxims are a significant topic in the Legal Aptitude section. Under legal aptitude in CLAT, two types of questions are commonly asked: Legal Reasoning and Legal Knowledge. Legal maxims questions fall under the category of Legal Knowledge in the CLAT exam, where candidates can expect 3-4 questions on this topic.

List of Key Legal Maxims for CLAT 2025

Here is a compilation of the top 50 essential legal maxims and phrases for the CLAT examination in 2025.

  1. Ab Initio – From the beginning.
  2. Actionable per se – The very act is punishable, and no proof of damage is required.
  3. Actio personalis moritur cum persona – A personal right of action dies with the person.
  4. Actori incumbit onus probandi – The burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
  5. Actus Reus Non Facit Reum Nisi Mens Sit Rea – Conviction of a crime requires proof of a criminal act and intent.
  6. Ad hoc – For the particular end or case at hand.
  7. Alibi – At another place, elsewhere.
  8. Amicus Curiae – A friend of the court or a member of the Bar appointed to assist the Court.
  9. Ante Litem Motam – Before a suit is brought; before controversy is instituted.
  10. Assentio mentium – The meeting of minds, mutual assents.
  11. Audi alteram partem – No person shall be condemned unheard.
  12. Bona fide – In good faith.
  13. Bona vacantia – Goods without an owner.
  14. Boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem – It is the part of a good judge to enlarge his jurisdiction.
  15. Caveat – A caution registered with the public court.
  16. Caveat actor – Let the doer beware.
  17. Caveat emptor – Let the buyer beware.
  18. Caveat venditor – Let the seller beware.
  19. Certiorari – A writ by which orders passed by an inferior court are quashed.
  20. Corpus – Body.
  21. Corpus delicti – The facts and circumstances constituting a crime and concrete evidence of a crime, such as a corpse.
  22. Damnum sine injuria – Damage without injury.
  23. De facto – In fact.
  24. De jure – By law.
  25. De minimis – About minimal things.
  26. De Minimis Non Curat Lex – The law does not govern trifles or ignore insignificant details.
  27. De novo – To make something anew.
  28. Dictum – A statement of law made by a judge but not necessary to the decision itself.
  29. Doli incapax – Incapable of crime.
  30. Detinue – Tort of wrongfully holding goods that belong to someone else.
  31. Donatio mortis causa – Gift because of death.
  32. Estoppel – Prevented from denying.
  33. Ex gratia – As a favor.
  34. Ex officio – Because of an office held.
  35. Ex parte – Proceedings in the absence of the other party.
  36. Ex post facto – After the fact.
  37. Fatum – Beyond human foresight.
  38. Factum probans – Relevant fact.
  39. Fraus est celare fraudem – It is a fraud to conceal a fraud.
  40. Functus officio – No longer having power or jurisdiction.
  41. Furiosi nulla voluntas est – Mentally impaired persons cannot validly sign a will, contract, or form the frame of mind necessary to commit a crime.
  42. Habeas corpus – A writ to have the body of a person brought before the judge.
  43. Ignorantia juris non-excusat – Ignorance of the law excuses no one.
  44. Injuria sine damno – Injury without damage.
  45. Ipso facto – By the mere fact.
  46. In promptu – In readiness.
  47. In lieu of – Instead of.
  48. In personam – A proceeding seeking relief against a specific person.
  49. Innuendo – Spoken words that are defamatory due to a double meaning.
  50. In status quo – In the present state.
  • 20 Shares

Join our WhatsApp
Channel

Join Now

Join our Telegram
Group

Join Now
Next Article

For submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

  • Hours: 9 AM - 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

LAW DRISHTI

Law Drishti – Your Insight into the Legal World. Navigate the intricacies of law with us! Tailored for law aspirants, students, advocates, and lawyers, Law Drishti offers a comprehensive platform where knowledge meets guidance. Stay updated on legal trends, access valuable resources, and embark on your legal journey with clarity and confidence. Illuminate your path with Law Drishti – where the vision of legal excellence comes to life.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Useful Links

Home

Phone

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

[email protected]

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

[email protected]

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

Search

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting CLATDrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Advertisements on Lawdrishti

For Advertisements on Lawdrishti

CLAT Drishti
Contact us
For Submitting a Post

[email protected]

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

[email protected]

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)